|
Parkway issue
heats up
Citrus County Chronicle,
August 30, 2001
By
Mike Wright
The unofficial
public-input process for the Suncoast Parkway project through Citrus
County kicked off Wednesday night with a largely skeptical crowd casting
doubt on promises that the study will be fair.
About
120 people packed into the Crystal Oaks community hall to hear consultant
Carl Gibilaro explain the three-year process to study whether the
tollroad should continue through Citrus.
Gibilaro,
project manager for what is known as Suncoast 2, promised public
involvement will be key to the process.
“We
hear what people are telling us every day,” he said.
“We’re
not here to tell you we’re going to slam it down your throat. You’ll
have to live with it every day.”
The
43-mile Suncoast Parkway 1 stretches from the Veterans Expressway
in Tampa to U.S. 98 just south of the Citrus County line. A proposed
corridor set in 1998 that moved the parkway through Citrus was scrapped
for several reasons, including because the state bought environmental
uplands in the corridor’s path.
“We’re
going to go back and look at the project from scratch,” Gibilaro
said.
Gibilaro
said Wednesday was his first opportunity to address a public group
on the project. Officially, public meetings and citizen advisory
groups will begin meeting later this year.
Gibilaro
said he’s heard from both sides of the issue, but the crowd at Crystal
Oaks was clearly one-sided against the parkway.
The
audience questioned the state’s commitment to a “no build” option,
criticized traffic projections, suggested the road isn’t needed
in Citrus County and said the road will not pay for itself.
Some
anger was directed at Citrus County commissioners, who have refused
requests for a public referendum on the issue.
Commissioners
have said the parkway is needed to alleviate traffic from growth
and public sentiment won’t change that need.
“We
bought a home here for our families, not for the tourists,” Theresa
Waldron, Lecanto, said.
“All
the profit seekers, we don’t care about them. Put it on a referendum
and ask the people who live here if they want it.”
Gibilaro
said he had nothing to do with the referendum, but he said public
support was critical to getting the road built.
To
that, Carl Simpson said he doubted the turnpike district would value
opinion from citizens over that of the county commission.
“You
don’t listen to us. The only one you listened to is the county commission,”
said Simpson, a Pine Ridge resident.
“What
is community support? What exactly is that?”
Gibilaro
tried to assure the crowd. “As we go through the study, we’ll listen
to you,” he said.
As
the meeting wound down, Vincent Mace, Floral City, rose to make
his point.
“My
question is, is there anything groups like this can do to stop the
whole thing?”
Hearing
approval from the crowd, Mace bellowed: “Do we need it? Can we afford
it? Do we like it?”
Each
question was met with a resounding “No!”
Gibilaro
promised to make himself available to any group wanting to learn
about the study process. He can be reached at (407) 532-3999, Ext.
3412.
See
August 30, 2001 issue of Citrus County Chronicle for original
article.
|